Outer Hades, USA – Just in time for Halloween.
LWOH has reported here and here and here about President Obama's designated taxpayer stimulus of $19.5 billion plus to force or mandate the use of electronic medical records. This excellent Washington Post article by staff writer Alexi Mostrous entitled Electronic medical records not a cure-all is based upon interviews with more than two dozen doctors, academics, patients and computer programmers. They all indicate electronic health records (EHRs) increase errors, add hours to doctors' workloads and compromise patient care. One doctor reported his department found that physicians spent nearly five of every 10 hours on a computer. "I sit down and log on to a computer 60 times every shift. Physician productivity and satisfaction have fallen off a cliff."
Something is very wrong when the corporate health IT/EHR industry gains control over the health and safety of hospital patients and their doctors. Since electronic medical records are not classified as medical devices, hospitals are not required by law to report problems. Many health IT contracts do not even allow hospitals to discuss computer flaws, so who is driving this Ghost Train?
The WaPo article describes how doctors using EHRs are forced to deal with “cluttered screens, unresponsive vendors and illogical displays.” Christine Sinsky in Dubuque, Iowa, whose practice implemented electronic records six years ago offers this description of the poor EHR development and vendor support service she is confronted with here:
In addition to compromised public health safety and taxpayer stimulus dollar waste, doctors can be fired for mentioning problems with EHRs as IT-health industry executives and powerful government and health administration officials are shrouded in profitable secrecy. Stimulus dollars should be going directly to support physicians and hospitals and NOT to wasteful and life threatening IT health record development (many from shops who outsource to sub-par “skilled labor” guest visa and green card holders).
One ER physician explains how EHRs are, well, “a complete nightmare” here:
- An IT program designed to warn physicians about wrong dosages that was disconnected when the vendor updated the system, leading to misdoses.
- A software bug that misdiagnosed five people with herpes.
- Faulty software that miscalculated intracranial pressures and mixed up
- kilograms and pounds.
- A computer system that systematically gave adult doses of medications to children.
David Blumenthal, the head of health tech at the Department of Health and Human Services, acknowledged that the systems have flaws, and over the next tow months he will finalize the definition of “meaningful use” - a term to describe the standard used by hospitals and doctors to qualify health-IT stimulus funds. (Read more about “meaningful use” here with CCHIT's Mark Leavitt.) Blumenthal did not mention whether applicants would be required to submit “adverse event reports”, which are a safety net that many physicians and academic experts demand but health-IT vendors have resisted. Why would vendors not want to stand by their products' quality and submit adverse event reports? Could it be that these IT health EHR vendors are too preoccupied with cost cutting and profit hording to notice the life threatening risks their technology products and services have the potential to pose to the public?
So who IS watch-dogging the high-risk EHR/health-IT industry? Nobody.
David C. Classen is an associate professor of medicine at the University of Utah who recently completed a study on health IT installations and he explained the utter lack of IT-health regulations here:
As physicians confront a government mandate to switch from paper to cumbersome electronic records that reportedly pose higher risks to patients' lives, it comes as no surprise that physicians want to get back to the comprehensive basics of patient care, as many who are using them are uninstalling them, according to a June survey by HealthLeaders-InterStudy. But U.S. doctors are in danger of losing their jobs for complaining about the wasteful and unsafe technology.
Sharona Hoffman, a professor of law and bioethics at Case Western Reserve University in Cleveland, said:











